مناطق:Canada
25a_r1. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why excavation? Recode1
25a_r1. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why excavation? Recode1
نتایج
| 2005-03-20 | |
|---|---|
Site can be re-used | 10% |
Less likely to spread/keep if from spreading | 0% |
Easier/faster way to contain/control | 10% |
Something being ... problem/better than doing nothing | 0% |
Would remove it from/clean up area/would be gone | 3.33% |
Can take waste where .../treated effectively and safely | 13.33% |
Better way to contain and control/gets results | 3.33% |
Cost issues (various) | 10% |
Potential negative effects on environment/wildlife | 6.67% |
Less people affected/less threat to locals | 6.67% |
Depends on location | 10% |
Could still seep into/effect the ground | 10% |
Don't/can't trust anyone to monitor it | 10% |
Other | 6.67% |
DK/NA | 0% |
اندازه نمونه | 2,000 |
حجم نمونه محاسبه شده توسط VoxDash | 30 |
نمونهگیری احتمالی | |
حاشیه خطا | ±3% |
حاشیه خطا ( محاسبه شده توسط VoxDash) | ±17.86% |
* محاسبه شده توسط VoxDash | |
تأمینکننده داده | |
¤êم?¢ مêيê? | |
«ë éں¥?¢ ?ں«¦?§ىë§ى | autocomplete.Respondentqualificationage.18 |
ëêيëى? ©§ں©? §ں§ى | autocomplete.SamplingMethods.stratified sample |
¤ن©ںه?ںىں | Canada |
پوششها | autocomplete.DataCoverage.Provincial/State |
نقشه ها
گرفیک اصلی
نمودار دایره ای
گرافیک
نقشه ها
انتخاب نقشه
Canada
تایید
رد کردن
Information of Contaminated Sites 2005 Dataset