مناطق:Canada
25b_r2. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why leave material at site? Recode2
25b_r2. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why leave material at site? Recode2
نتایج
| 2005-03-20 | |
|---|---|
Easier solution/works faster | 18.18% |
Less likely to spread/keep it from spreading | 0% |
Results/better way to contain/control | 0% |
Shouldn't be moved around/better to leave it where it is | 9.09% |
Depends where/what type of site/problem it is | 0% |
Better for monitoring/studying purposes | 9.09% |
No need to move it/will ... own/already done its harm | 18.18% |
Other | 45.45% |
DK/NA | 0% |
اندازه نمونه | 2,000 |
حجم نمونه محاسبه شده توسط VoxDash | 11 |
نمونهگیری احتمالی | |
حاشیه خطا | ±3% |
حاشیه خطا ( محاسبه شده توسط VoxDash) | ±29.49% |
* محاسبه شده توسط VoxDash | |
تأمینکننده داده | |
¤êم?¢ مêيê? | |
«ë éں¥?¢ ?ں«¦?§ىë§ى | autocomplete.Respondentqualificationage.18 |
ëêيëى? ©§ں©? §ں§ى | autocomplete.SamplingMethods.stratified sample |
¤ن©ںه?ںىں | Canada |
پوششها | autocomplete.DataCoverage.Provincial/State |
نقشه ها
گرفیک اصلی
نمودار دایره ای
گرافیک
نقشه ها
انتخاب نقشه
Canada
تایید
رد کردن
Information of Contaminated Sites 2005 Dataset