Geographies:Canada
25a_m1. Why do you say this approach might be more effective? Why excavation? Mention1
25a_m1. Why do you say this approach might be more effective? Why excavation? Mention1
Results
| 2005-03-20 | |
|---|---|
Completely eliminates/removes the problem | 42.99% |
Only way to ensure hazards are removed | 18.22% |
Restores site to original condition | 8.88% |
Containment is not a solution | 15.89% |
Containment is not a long term solution | 8.41% |
Other | 5.61% |
DK/NA | 0% |
Sample size | 2,000 |
Sample size calculated by VoxDash | 214 |
Probability sampling | |
Margin of error | ±3% |
Margin of error (calculated by VoxDash) | ±6.69% |
Calculated by VoxDash | |
Data provider | |
General population | |
Respondent qualification age | autocomplete.Respondentqualificationage.18 |
Data sampling | autocomplete.SamplingMethods.stratified sample |
Geographies | Canada |
Coverages | autocomplete.DataCoverage.Provincial/State |
Maps
Main graphics
Pie chart
Graphics
Maps
Select map
Canada
Accept
Reject
Information of Contaminated Sites 2005 Dataset