Geographies:Canada
25b_m1. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why leave material at site? Mention1
25b_m1. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why leave material at site? Mention1
Results
| 2005-03-20 | |
|---|---|
Excavation can increase hazards | 24.81% |
Excavation not always possible | 1.5% |
Excavation is too costly/impractical | 24.81% |
Excavation is disruptive | 3.01% |
Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else | 21.8% |
Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else | 19.55% |
Other | 4.51% |
DK/NA | 0% |
Sample size | 2,000 |
Sample size calculated by VoxDash | 133 |
Probability sampling | |
Margin of error | ±3% |
Margin of error (calculated by VoxDash) | ±8.48% |
Calculated by VoxDash | |
Data provider | |
General population | |
Respondent qualification age | autocomplete.Respondentqualificationage.18 |
Data sampling | autocomplete.SamplingMethods.stratified sample |
Geographies | Canada |
Coverages | autocomplete.DataCoverage.Provincial/State |
Maps
Main graphics
Pie chart
Graphics
Maps
Select map
Canada
Accept
Reject
Information of Contaminated Sites 2005 Dataset