Geographies:Canada
25b_r2. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why leave material at site? Recode2
25b_r2. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why leave material at site? Recode2
Results
| 2005-03-20 | |
|---|---|
Easier solution/works faster | 18.18% |
Less likely to spread/keep it from spreading | 0% |
Results/better way to contain/control | 0% |
Shouldn't be moved around/better to leave it where it is | 9.09% |
Depends where/what type of site/problem it is | 0% |
Better for monitoring/studying purposes | 9.09% |
No need to move it/will ... own/already done its harm | 18.18% |
Other | 45.45% |
DK/NA | 0% |
Sample size | 2,000 |
Sample size calculated by VoxDash | 11 |
Probability sampling | |
Margin of error | ±3% |
Margin of error (calculated by VoxDash) | ±29.49% |
Calculated by VoxDash | |
Data provider | |
General population | |
Respondent qualification age | autocomplete.Respondentqualificationage.18 |
Data sampling | autocomplete.SamplingMethods.stratified sample |
Geographies | Canada |
Coverages | autocomplete.DataCoverage.Provincial/State |
Maps
Main graphics
Pie chart
Graphics
Maps
Select map
Canada
Accept
Reject
Information of Contaminated Sites 2005 Dataset