Filter By
Data Projects(0)
Vendors(0)
Individuals(0)
Questions(125)
Topics
Keywords of qualification
Regions
Years
Maps
Search
Ecosystem
0 Sub Topics
0 Followers
Follow
Data Profiles
0Data Projects
0Vendors
0Questions
0Individuals
0Surveys
0
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
N/A Monitoring was not performed by the project. , Monitoring was performed, but was unable to conclusively find any human well-being benefit at this time. , The project staff believes that there are human well-being benefits based on personal visits to the project site and/or anecdotal evidence, but there is no supporting data. , some evidence , conclusive evidence
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
A Health Impact Assessment was completed in a portion of the area before the work began , No monitoring specific to this project. Project based human well-being impacts based on other studies of green spaces. , Project creates an official boat launch site that had historically been used as one. No monitoring is planned as main benefit of recreational improvement is reduced erosion. , Project funded multiple individual grant projects, each project may answer differently , modeling to determine flooding impacts , pre-test and post-test to high school students as target for outreach , Assessing impacts of invasive species on privately owned shorelines , A survey pre and post-treatment of site conditions from a human services perspective. This was done by the monitoring crew as part of the detailed assessments in a three tiered monitoring system , EPA-led Health Impact Assessment , Improving health and well being through recreation is a secondary objective and is achieved by designing the restoraiton to complement future city amenities (trails, fishing, etc). , The project is adjacent to a city park and was done in conjunction with a large City-funded revitilization project. The City of Duluth may have park user data. , Partner study with SUNY ESF - attitudes/knowledge about invasive species , For this project, one of two remaining dams in the Cuyahoga River AOC was removed. Paddlers no longer drown the dam's hydraulics. , Comments collected from the public visiting sites and hearing about priojects. , Comments recieved by the public about projects. , guest book on site for comments and how they heard about preserve , Cultural Revitalization , project not yet complete , Photographic
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
Other
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
Life Satisfaction and Happiness (Examples: Revitalization, community perception/satisfaction study)
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
Governance (Examples: Project improved community rating system (CRS) score or reduced flood insurance premiums)
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
Leisure and Connection to Nature (Examples: Number of visitors, ecotourism business using space, rec. equipment rentals)
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
Safety and Security (Examples: Project monitored storm surge, property damage, or the number of insurance claims)
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
Education (Examples: project monitored the number of interpretive programs or attendance at outreach events)
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
Social Cohesion (Examples: Community involvement in design, implementation, and inauguration; volunteer efforts were measured)
From Dataset(s):
Collection Date:2021-03-01
Response Options:
Public Health (Examples: project tested water quality or pollution specifically for public health reasons)