Response options: N/A Monitoring was not performed by the project., Monitoring was performed, but was unable to conclusively find any ecological/biological benefits at this time., The project staff believes that there are ecological/biological benefits based on personal visits to the project site and/or anecdotal evidence, but there is no supporting data., There is some evidence of ecological/biological improvement, but the results were limited by the monitoring duration, frequency, or geographic extent or by the lack of a baseline or control group., There is conclusive evidence of positive ecological/biological benefits compared to the original baseline or control condition.

Survey question

From dataset(s):

Great Lakes Restoration Initiative human wellbeing survey

Collection date: 2021-03-01

What type of monitoring was done to assess the ecological/biological impact of the project? [Please check all that apply] - Other - Text

Response options: It was difficult to accruately answer these questions as we had two projects on two creeks: one project consisted of sampling water quality on Beartrap Creek while the other consisted of completing a culvert replacement on Sucker Creek. One was intensive monitoring, the other was not., This was a planning project and considered existing/ongoing monitoring data to set indicators and metrics for measuring progress., Note that the project is ongoing so results oriented data is not available yet., Pre and Post flow rates, Visual observation during site visits after completion, A sampling station was set up to compare this park site with the other Jackson Street Parking Lot site to analyze impacts for inclusion in future Stormwater Management guides., Impact based on water quality modeling, This project has not broke ground yet, so water quality sampling has not occurred., Hydrology monitoring, spot checks by conservation staff, Project funded multiple individual grant projects, each project may answer differently, bacteria monitoring at local beach (E.coli), Extensive baseline survey and cross-sectional data were collected - Project will be implemented in 2021 and follow-up survey data will be collected and compared to the baseline data. Cannot yet answer the next two questions in this survey., Flow monitoring, Post-implementation monitoring has not yet been conducted, Post restoration monitoring has not been performed yet, The Ohio EPA will include this project site in their long-term vegetation and wildlife monitoring program, regeneration and survivability counts of planted, young jack pine, N/A Land acquisition, This project is still ongoing. Final monitoring is pending completion of project deliverables.

Survey question

From dataset(s):

Great Lakes Restoration Initiative human wellbeing survey

Collection date: 2021-03-01

What type of monitoring was done to assess the ecological/biological impact of the project? [Please check all that apply] - Selected Choice Other

Response options: Other

Survey question

From dataset(s):

Great Lakes Restoration Initiative human wellbeing survey

Collection date: 2021-03-01

What type of monitoring was done to assess the ecological/biological impact of the project? [Please check all that apply] - Selected Choice Coastal or riparian erosion rate reduction (Aerial observation)

Response options: Coastal or riparian erosion rate reduction (Aerial observation)