Response options: Completely eliminates/removes the problem, Only way to ensure hazards are removed, Restores site to original condition, Containment is not a solution, Containment is not a long term solution, Other, DK/NA
Response options: Site can be re-used, Less likely to spread/keep if from spreading, Easier/faster way to contain/control, Something being ... problem/better than doing nothing, Would remove it from/clean up area/would be gone, Can take waste where .../treated effectively and safely, Better way to contain and control/gets results, Cost issues (various), Potential negative effects on environment/wildlife, Less people affected/less threat to locals, Depends on location, Could still seep into/effect the ground, Don't/can't trust anyone to monitor it, Other, DK/NA
Response options: Excavation can increase hazards, Excavation not always possible, Excavation is too costly/impractical, Excavation is disruptive, Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else, Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else, Other, DK/NA
Response options: Government (unspecified), No one/nobody's doing anything, Territorial government, First Nations government, Volunteers, Owners/landowners, Environmentalists/environmental groups, Local community group/the community, Individuals/private citizens, Indian and Northern Affairs, Environmental groups (various), People/public agency charged with clean-up/testing water, Crown corporations (various), American government/army, First Nations groups (various), Those that caused the contamination, Other, DK/NA