Court

0 Subtopics

0 Followers

Data profiles

Data projects

Vendors

Questions

339

Individuals

Surveys

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (2006-2015)

Collection date: 2015-07-27

Case type

Response options: [ARDA note: label missing], [ARDA note: label missing]

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (1996-2005)

Collection date: 2005-07-27

[Recode of FE_CASE into dummy variables] Case involves public education, at the elementary level, including issues involving instruction and religious meetings or distribution of literature in schools by students

Response options: No, Yes

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (2006-2015)

Collection date: 2015-07-27

If the party raising the religious claim is a defendant (rather than a plaintiff), then code for 1 if the defendant prevailed on any religious claim and 0 otherwise. If the plaintiff raises the claim, rather than the defendant, then code as 99.

Response options: Claimant did not prevail, Claimant prevailed, Not applicable

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (1986-1995)

Collection date: 1995-07-27

Anti-political

Response options: Claimant win on establishment/claimant loss on free exercise, Claimant win on free exercise/claimant loss on establishment

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (1996-2005)

Collection date: 2005-07-27

[Recode of FE_CASE into dummy variables] Case involves public education, at the secondary or higher education levels, including issues involving instruction and religious meetings or distribution of literature in schools by students

Response options: No, Yes

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (2006-2015)

Collection date: 2015-07-27

If the claimant raised a claim under the Equal Access Act, then code for 1 if the claimant prevailed on that claim and 0 otherwise. If the claimant did not raise an EAA claim, then code as 99.

Response options: Claimant did not prevail, Claimant prevailed, Not applicable

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (1996-2005)

Collection date: 2005-07-27

[Recode of FE_CASE into dummy variables] Cases involving free exercise of religion claims by convicted criminals incarcerated in state or federal correctional facilities, that is, claims involving prison rules that affect religious practice and not challen

Response options: No, Yes

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (2006-2015)

Collection date: 2015-07-27

For all the Court of Appeals decisions, this should be coded 1. For all District Court decisions, this should be coded 0.

Response options: No, Yes

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (1986-1995)

Collection date: 1995-07-27

Judicial restriction

Response options: Claimant win on establishment/claimant loss on free exercise, Claimant win on free exercise/claimant loss on establishment

Survey questionEmpirical Study of Religious Liberty Decisions (1996-2005)

Collection date: 2005-07-27

[Recode of CLM_REL into dummy variables] Claimant is Muslim

Response options: No, Yes

Show

Court

Main pages

About VoxDash

Surveys