Response options: This was just a design project and is in the process of being completed. Some of the questions should be reworded to better indicate the actual intent...Such as "How many unique fiscal years of GLRI funding did this project receive including feasibility, design, implementation, and monitoring?" The grant funds can be allocated in a specific fiscal year but the distribution of funds may be over multi fiscal years. So the money is technically set aside in one way and spent another., This is the construction project of ID 19 design project...it is not completed at this time. to be completed in 2023, This proejct has not been completed at this time. The construction is expected to be completed in 2022, this was a design project only ,as listed. The project description provided is incorrect., The project has not been implemented yet. The grant ends on 9/30/2021 and the culvert replacement is scheduled for this summer. Many of the questions in this survey assume project completion and therefore are not applicable at this point., This was our first GLRI project and it helped us build capacity and start us on a GLRI implementation path. First round of GLRI funding was more limited, which made it more challenging for project design., tribal citizens very pleased with increasing their land base within Reservation boundaries, especially for subsistence hunting fishing and gathering opportunity, We can provide final report and monitoring dataset, if we have the time. Though I find this to be a valuable research project, I had difficult answering the questions for this multifaceted project, since in some instances it was yes/no scenario depending on which project deliverable was being discussed., We did a newsletter article about this project in our Department's quarterly newsletter., Monitoring and research was conducted by a variety of agencies and universities and has not been archived with a single agency at this time., A lot of these questions are not directly related to the project as it was a planning effort and not a project implementation effort., This was an acquisition project aimed at protecting source water and living infrastructure so no reports exist., Project is ongoing so results are not final and there is no final report., While the answer is currently 'no' to these last two questions, we will be developing a final report with monitoring data and results included that will be submitted in January 2021 and would be happy to share. Please contact [email protected] if you are interested in seeing the report., This project is still in the design phase, therefore many of the survey questions were answered as N/A or 'neither agree or disagree' accordingly., There is a manuscript based on this project, Publication Caldwell, Woolnough, and Zanatta came from this project and two MS theses (available from CMU online), This grant include 3 project, GI for a park improvement, brownfield test project and a road project GI raingarden to meet MPCA CSW requirements., The Mn Dept of Health does water sampling at this beach, the project did not interact with the testing/monitoring of water quality, independent agencies., This project was specifically for obtaining baseline survey data and moving the area toward permanent open space protection.
Response options: To target litter pollution, increased bird populations loafing on/near a beach, and near-beach runoff that leads to increased e. coli vectors that close beaches excessively, Increase aquatic passage connectivity to Lake Superior and increase Brook Trout habitat., To build tribal capacity, To develop a strategic blueprint for conservation of habitat within our watershed., Reduce sediment and phosphorus to the Genesee River Basin by streambank restoration, Restoration of two acres of wetlands, prevent further bank erosion, provide water view/access, educate, reduce pollution runoff, increase land and water (shallow & deep water) habitat, Reduce stormwater runoff, Reduce hazards to nesting adults and pre-fledged common tern chicks, imporove nesting substrate, manage vegetation, allow more thorough monitoring of the site, reduce threats of drowning to pre-fledged chicks, and increase the size of the nesting colony, Protect human health and reduce bacterial inputs at beaches, Preserve 400 acres, prevent 26 tons of sediment, 1,160 lbs of nitrogen and 108 lbs of phosphorus from entering Lake MI watershed, restoration of fish & wildlife habitat, Did not receive funding, Watershed health and aquatic organism passage improvement/connectivity, watershed health, aquatic organism passage, connectivity, Instill a sense of place and connection to cultural and natural resources in tribal youth, To improve capacity and communication among managers of public, private and tribal lands for the management of invasive species, This is an AOC coordination grant to assess BUIs within the Eighteenmile Creek AOC, Project planning for BUI removal, Aquatic and Riparian Habitat enhancement
Response options: Lake Superior LAMP, State Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy; USEPA Binational Collaborative for the Conservation of Great Lakes Islands;, MPCA CSW Permit, Beach Impairment E.coli, City of Duluth Natural Areas Program, GREAT LAKES LEGACY ACT, Green Infrastructure, not sure, Fish and Wildlife preservation, NYS ECL Article 24- freshwater wetlands, Unsure, Invasive species, CZM, Recreational Water, Invasive species control, Natural Resources Damages Assessment, Listed species - threatened status, AIS, Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Program, GLRI