12 provinces · 2 cities · 118 other
Description
Subregions
Data in VoxDash
The survey is funded by the United Kingdom's Good Governance Fund (GGF). Prior to March 2017, this survey was funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). Products produced on the website cannot be attributed to GGF, the UK government, or NDI, nor to SIDA or the Swedish government."
This survey was conducted in the framework of the Council of Europe Co-operation Project 'Fight against Discrimination, Hate Crime and Hate Speech in Georgia'. The opinions expressed in the survey and within the report based on it are the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe.
The incorporation of data sharing into the research lifecycle is an important part of modern scholarly debate. In this study, the DataONE Usability and Assessment working group addresses two primary goals: To examine the current state of data sharing and reuse perceptions and practices among research scientists as they compare to the 2009/2010 baseline study, and to examine differences in practices and perceptions across age groups, geographic regions, and subject disciplines. We distributed surveys to a multinational sample of scientific researchers at two different time periods (October 2009 to July 2010 and October 2013 to March 2014) to observe current states of data sharing and to see what, if any, changes have occurred in the past 3–4 years. We also looked at differences across age, geographic, and discipline-based groups as they currently exist in the 2013/2014 survey. Results point to increased acceptance of and willingness to engage in data sharing, as well as an increase in actual data sharing behaviors. However, there is also increased perceived risk associated with data sharing, and specific barriers to data sharing persist. There are also differences across age groups, with younger respondents feeling more favorably toward data sharing and reuse, yet making less of their data available than older respondents. Geographic differences exist as well, which can in part be understood in terms of collectivist and individualist cultural differences. An examination of subject disciplines shows that the constraints and enablers of data sharing and reuse manifest differently across disciplines. Implications of these findings include the continued need to build infrastructure that promotes data sharing while recognizing the needs of different research communities. Moving into the future, organizations such as DataONE will continue to assess, monitor, educate, and provide the infrastructure necessary to support such complex grand science challenges.
The survey is funded by the United Kingdom's Good Governance Fund (GGF). Prior to March 2017, this survey was funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). Products produced on the website cannot be attributed to GGF, the UK government, or NDI, nor to SIDA or the Swedish government."

Data project
Omnibus surveys combine questions from different organizations and researchers into a single survey. This enables data collection at significantly reduced costs compared with commissioning an entire survey. CRRC Georgia offers a quarterly omnibus survey. CRRC's Omnibus has an achieved sample size of 1000 respondents, is conducted face to face, and is nationally representative. Demographic cross tabulations are provided for each question, including age, sex, education level, employment status, and settlement type (Capital, other urban, rural).

Data project
Omnibus surveys combine questions from different organizations and researchers into a single survey. This enables data collection at significantly reduced costs compared with commissioning an entire survey. CRRC Georgia offers a quarterly omnibus survey. CRRC's Omnibus has an achieved sample size of 1000 respondents, is conducted face to face, and is nationally representative. Demographic cross tabulations are provided for each question, including age, sex, education level, employment status, and settlement type (Capital, other urban, rural).