Geografías:United States
Gráficos principales
Gráfico circular
Information about the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative human wellbeing survey Dataset
Answer breakdown (table)
| Answer | Share |
|---|---|
| newsletter article in a periodical shared to general public and partners | 2.7% |
| Public notice of applicable permits with a comment opportunity. | 2.7% |
| Landowners, stakeholders, USFWS and Michigan DNR involved in many decisions. | 2.7% |
| Clinton River AOC Public Advisory Council | 2.7% |
| Public Outreach and stakeholder meetings were held at the time of developing the park master plan which the project was based off of. | 2.7% |
| CITY OF MONROE COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT & WATER QUALITY USED LOCALLY | 2.7% |
| A master plan was conducted several years earlier that involved stakeholders and significant public input, but there weren't any specific public meetings for this project only. | 2.7% |
| Public education, trainaings and flyers were created at the conclusion of the project. | 2.7% |
| A local advisory board was in place and formed 10+ years ago to achieve the organization's goals for the river. | 2.7% |
| unknown | 5.41% |
| Project funded multiple individual grant projects, each project may answer differently | 2.7% |
| Project Website | 2.7% |
| Community partners were engaged to help with volunteer removals | 2.7% |
| workshops held with agency reps | 2.7% |
| student field trips were engaged in restoration activities. | 2.7% |
| school groups and volunteer groups were involved in invasive species | 2.7% |
| This project is ongoing. | 2.7% |
| Local partners are involved in development and implementation (didn't check the local partner option because we also engaged general public); Public comment period on chemical treatments will occur in FY21 | 2.7% |
| EPA-led Health Impact Assessment | 2.7% |
| Design is currently in progress - these outreach activities are planned | 2.7% |
| Sign was installed to showcase project | 2.7% |
| Involves multiple community organizations for conservation efforts and public education | 2.7% |
| Regular public outreach is conducted to demonstrate planning work that has been completed or upcoming BUI removals. | 2.7% |
| Local Partners and/or consultants were contacted to provide input and general public informed/engaged by annual open house events/public comments. | 2.7% |
| One on one communication with landowners to describe the program and encourage to install BMPs | 2.7% |
| direct outreach to landowners with traget invasive species education and control | 2.7% |
| private landowner engagement in workshops and invasive species removal on their property | 5.41% |
| Skateboarders engaged in charretts to design the park features. | 2.7% |
| The project is at a stage in which the public has not yet been engaged, but local partners, consultants, and the technical advisory committee for the AOC has been involved to provide input. | 2.7% |
| Many meetings with local government officials | 2.7% |
| Public notices were sent out prior to herbicide treatments. | 2.7% |
| Stakeholders took it upon themselves to seek and procure donations from general public, conservation organizations, etc. | 2.7% |
| In a partnership with a local CWMA, the public is invited to the island to learn and conduct invasive species removal each fall. There was no public comment period, however. | 2.7% |
| Public notices were sent out prior to invasive work usingh herbicides. No public hearing was needed, however. | 2.7% |
| Public notices were sent out prior to herbicide treatments. No public meetings were required however. | 2.7% |