Information about the Contaminated Sites 2005 Dataset
Answer breakdown (table)
| Answer | Share |
|---|---|
| Site can be re-used | 0% |
| Less likely to spread/keep if from spreading | 0% |
| Easier/faster way to contain/control | 0% |
| Something being ... problem/better than doing nothing | 0% |
| Would remove it from/clean up area/would be gone | 0% |
| Can take waste where .../treated effectively and safely | 0% |
| Better way to contain and control/gets results | 0% |
| Cost issues (various) | 0% |
| Potential negative effects on environment/wildlife | 0% |
| Less people affected/less threat to locals | 0% |
| Depends on location | 0% |
| Could still seep into/effect the ground | 0% |
| Don't/can't trust anyone to monitor it | 0% |
| Other | 100% |
| DK/NA | 0% |