Voxdash logo

voxdash question

Did the project conduct any public outreach or engagement? (e.g. Public scoping through a meeting, an online forum, or door to door) [Please check all that apply] - Other - Text

voxdash question
Did the project conduct any public outreach or engagement? (e.g. Public scoping through a meeting, an online forum, or door to door) [Please check all that apply] - Other - Text
Results
2021 Mar
newsletter article in a periodical shared to general public and partners
0%
Public notice of applicable permits with a comment opportunity.
0%
Landowners, stakeholders, USFWS and Michigan DNR involved in many decisions.
5.26%
Clinton River AOC Public Advisory Council
5.26%
Public Outreach and stakeholder meetings were held at the time of developing the park master plan which the project was based off of.
0%
CITY OF MONROE COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT & WATER QUALITY USED LOCALLY
5.26%
A master plan was conducted several years earlier that involved stakeholders and significant public input, but there weren't any specific public meetings for this project only.
0%
Public education, trainaings and flyers were created at the conclusion of the project.
5.26%
A local advisory board was in place and formed 10+ years ago to achieve the organization's goals for the river.
0%
unknown
0%
Project funded multiple individual grant projects, each project may answer differently
0%
Project Website
5.26%
Community partners were engaged to help with volunteer removals
0%
workshops held with agency reps
5.26%
student field trips were engaged in restoration activities.
5.26%
school groups and volunteer groups were involved in invasive species
5.26%
This project is ongoing.
0%
Local partners are involved in development and implementation (didn't check the local partner option because we also engaged general public); Public comment period on chemical treatments will occur in FY21
5.26%
EPA-led Health Impact Assessment
0%
Design is currently in progress - these outreach activities are planned
0%
Sign was installed to showcase project
5.26%
Involves multiple community organizations for conservation efforts and public education
0%
Regular public outreach is conducted to demonstrate planning work that has been completed or upcoming BUI removals.
5.26%
Local Partners and/or consultants were contacted to provide input and general public informed/engaged by annual open house events/public comments.
5.26%
One on one communication with landowners to describe the program and encourage to install BMPs
5.26%
direct outreach to landowners with traget invasive species education and control
5.26%
private landowner engagement in workshops and invasive species removal on their property
0%
Skateboarders engaged in charretts to design the park features.
0%
The project is at a stage in which the public has not yet been engaged, but local partners, consultants, and the technical advisory committee for the AOC has been involved to provide input.
0%
Many meetings with local government officials
0%
Public notices were sent out prior to herbicide treatments.
5.26%
Stakeholders took it upon themselves to seek and procure donations from general public, conservation organizations, etc.
5.26%
In a partnership with a local CWMA, the public is invited to the island to learn and conduct invasive species removal each fall. There was no public comment period, however.
5.26%
Public notices were sent out prior to invasive work usingh herbicides. No public hearing was needed, however.
5.26%
Public notices were sent out prior to herbicide treatments. No public meetings were required however.
5.26%
Sample size
448
Sample size calculated by VoxDash
19
Probability sampling
Margin of error
±5%
Comparable margin of error
±22.48%
Calculated by VoxDash
Data provider
General population
Respondent qualification age
18
Data sampling
Nonprobability sampling
Geographies
United States of America
Coverages
Unknown
Main graphics
Pie chart

Choose the questions

Open in new tab
Run analysis
Accept
Reject
Overview
Files
Metadata
Limitations
Technical info
Network
Terms and contract