Crosstab with

  • Education
  • Gender
  • Gender
Crosstab with any other Questions

Filter by response option

Gender
  • DK/NA
  • Female
  • Male
Gender
  • DK/NA
  • Female
  • Male
Education
  • DK/NA
  • Grade school or less
  • High school grad
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Some high school
  • Some university
  • University grad
  • Vocational/technical
Filter by response option(s) of any other question
Search
RegionsCanada
25a_r4. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why excavation? Recode4
Access To:
Contaminated Sites 2005
25a_r4. Why do you say this approach might be more effective?Why excavation? Recode4
Results
Add Group
2005 Mar 20
Site can be re-used
0%
Less likely to spread/keep if from spreading
0%
Easier/faster way to contain/control
0%
Something being ... problem/better than doing nothing
0%
Would remove it from/clean up area/would be gone
0%
Can take waste where .../treated effectively and safely
0%
Better way to contain and control/gets results
0%
Cost issues (various)
0%
Potential negative effects on environment/wildlife
0%
Less people affected/less threat to locals
0%
Depends on location
0%
Could still seep into/effect the ground
0%
Don't/can't trust anyone to monitor it
0%
Other
100%
DK/NA
0%
Sample Size1
Calculated by Voxdash
General Papulation
Data SamplingNon-probability-based online panel
RegionsCanada
CoveragesNational

Choose the questions

Open in new tab
Run Analysis
pages.question.[[...params]].IranAnalyticsFieldsAnOmnibusTelephonePollOfTheIranianPeopleOnAnOngoingB
pages.question.[[...params]].Accept
pages.question.[[...params]].Reject
pages.question.[[...params]].Close
Main Graphics
Single view
See All
Pie Chart
Maps
Base map
Login to create New Map
Each Response:
Other
All Responses
Canada - Base Map - Other
Canada - Base Map - Majority
Regional results
Information of Contaminated Sites 2005 Dataset
Overview
Files
Metadata
Limitation
Technical Info
Network
Contract
Citation