Datasets(12)
Vendors(0)
Individuals(0)
Questions(2,857)
Data sampling - Unknown
0 Subtopics
0 Followers
Follow
Survey question
Collection date: 2005-07-27
Response options: No, Yes
Survey question
Collection date: 2005-07-27
Response options: 917 F.Supp. 773, 334 F.Supp.2d 1286, 91 F.Supp.2d 1253, 192 F.Supp.2d 899, 139 F.Supp.2d 1029, 250 F.Supp.2d 1016, 147 F.3d 1282, 320 F.3d 979, 323 F.3d 1185, 372 F.3d 1128, 191 Ed. Law Rep. 803, 150 F.3d 276, 223 F.3d 220, 336 F.3d 211, 118 Fed.Appx. 1, 170 F.3d 359, 227 F.3d 47, 226 F.3d 198, 260 F.3d 265, 240 F.3d 200
Survey question
Collection date: 1995-07-27
Response options: 8/9/1990, 1/27/1986, 9/23/1986, 10/31/1989, 7/5/1989, 8/10/1993, 8/15/1989, 9/7/1989, 8/7/1991, 12/23/1993, 9/30/1994, 10/3/1986, 4/24/1987, 9/22/1988, 4/18/1988, 3/13/1991, 1/25/1991, 2/3/1986, 10/17/1995, 8/1/1989
Survey question
Collection date: 1995-07-27
Response options: Ackerman, Adams, Aldisert, Aldrich, Alito, Allen, Altimari, Anderson, Arnold, M., Arnold, R., Aronovitz, Arraj, Aspen, Atkins, Babcock, Baker, Baldock, Barbour, Barker, Barksdale
Survey question
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: This was just a design project and is in the process of being completed. Some of the questions should be reworded to better indicate the actual intent...Such as "How many unique fiscal years of GLRI funding did this project receive including feasibility, design, implementation, and monitoring?" The grant funds can be allocated in a specific fiscal year but the distribution of funds may be over multi fiscal years. So the money is technically set aside in one way and spent another., This is the construction project of ID 19 design project...it is not completed at this time. to be completed in 2023, This proejct has not been completed at this time. The construction is expected to be completed in 2022, this was a design project only ,as listed. The project description provided is incorrect., The project has not been implemented yet. The grant ends on 9/30/2021 and the culvert replacement is scheduled for this summer. Many of the questions in this survey assume project completion and therefore are not applicable at this point., This was our first GLRI project and it helped us build capacity and start us on a GLRI implementation path. First round of GLRI funding was more limited, which made it more challenging for project design., tribal citizens very pleased with increasing their land base within Reservation boundaries, especially for subsistence hunting fishing and gathering opportunity, We can provide final report and monitoring dataset, if we have the time. Though I find this to be a valuable research project, I had difficult answering the questions for this multifaceted project, since in some instances it was yes/no scenario depending on which project deliverable was being discussed., We did a newsletter article about this project in our Department's quarterly newsletter., Monitoring and research was conducted by a variety of agencies and universities and has not been archived with a single agency at this time., A lot of these questions are not directly related to the project as it was a planning effort and not a project implementation effort., This was an acquisition project aimed at protecting source water and living infrastructure so no reports exist., Project is ongoing so results are not final and there is no final report., While the answer is currently 'no' to these last two questions, we will be developing a final report with monitoring data and results included that will be submitted in January 2021 and would be happy to share. Please contact [email protected] if you are interested in seeing the report., This project is still in the design phase, therefore many of the survey questions were answered as N/A or 'neither agree or disagree' accordingly., There is a manuscript based on this project, Publication Caldwell, Woolnough, and Zanatta came from this project and two MS theses (available from CMU online), This grant include 3 project, GI for a park improvement, brownfield test project and a road project GI raingarden to meet MPCA CSW requirements., The Mn Dept of Health does water sampling at this beach, the project did not interact with the testing/monitoring of water quality, independent agencies., This project was specifically for obtaining baseline survey data and moving the area toward permanent open space protection.
Survey question
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: Other
Survey question
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: Contractor bids for culverts and bridge options, Projects were prioritized based on the benefits achieved per estimated dollar spent., unknown, NRCS practice standards have an inherent economic analysis, NRCS technical standards inherently contain economic analysis, NRCS practice standards contain inherent economic analysis, Project funded multiple individual grant projects, each project may answer differently, Through NRCS conservation practice standards utilized, inherent in NRCS conservation practice standards, Through individual practice standards, Unsure, informal with benefits from resource conservation and tourism considered, We did our own CBA, but nothing official, internal CBA, but nothing official, Decision analysis as part of structured decision making process, Economic impacts considered in Health Impact Analysis but not closely analyzed/quantified, No. Not required for GLRI., Ecosystems Services Valuation, Minimally addressed in proposal, Phase I included a job creation analysis because it was funded during the recession
Survey question
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: The project was implemented by a Tribe (at-risk, minority, and low-income population), One project was located in a low to moderate income area, unknown, Project funded multiple individual grant projects, each project may answer differently, The project was completed in part by a justice-involved job training program for local citizens, no, The project is located at a public park serving all community members, project provides recretional opportunities in a rural location that is economically depressed and has potential to boost tourism income, NEPA and NHPA process engaged tribal groups in the review process, EPA-led Health Impact Analysis, Design is currently in progress - these outreach activities are planned, No, This was not a GLRI priority or reason for funding. But this project is at a Boy Scout camp that is open to any enrolled youth & has a specific program to include diverse participants., project engaged underserved youth in stewardship activities, The project was designed to benefit species such as Lake Whitefish and Lake Trout, which are extremely important fisheries, which would directly benefit regional Odawa tribes., State minority hire contracting rules, The project will include environmental justice and equity as part of the design and implementation process, but has not yet gotten to those stages., Incorporated work crews from the Gordon Corretion Center (GCC) Community Enhancement Program. The GCC project crew assists local government agencies and non-profit organizations on a variety of work projects, incorporating a positive work experience, building new skills, and giving back to the community.
Survey question
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: newsletter article in a periodical shared to general public and partners, Public notice of applicable permits with a comment opportunity., Landowners, stakeholders, USFWS and Michigan DNR involved in many decisions., Clinton River AOC Public Advisory Council, Public Outreach and stakeholder meetings were held at the time of developing the park master plan which the project was based off of., CITY OF MONROE COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT & WATER QUALITY USED LOCALLY, A master plan was conducted several years earlier that involved stakeholders and significant public input, but there weren't any specific public meetings for this project only., Public education, trainaings and flyers were created at the conclusion of the project., A local advisory board was in place and formed 10+ years ago to achieve the organization's goals for the river., unknown, Project funded multiple individual grant projects, each project may answer differently, Project Website, Community partners were engaged to help with volunteer removals, workshops held with agency reps, student field trips were engaged in restoration activities., school groups and volunteer groups were involved in invasive species, This project is ongoing., Local partners are involved in development and implementation (didn't check the local partner option because we also engaged general public); Public comment period on chemical treatments will occur in FY21, EPA-led Health Impact Assessment, Design is currently in progress - these outreach activities are planned