Data projects(1)
Vendors(0)
Individuals(0)
Questions(106)
Habitat
0 Subtopics
0 Followers
Follow
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: The project was implemented by a Tribe (at-risk, minority, and low-income population), One project was located in a low to moderate income area, unknown, Project funded multiple individual grant projects, each project may answer differently, The project was completed in part by a justice-involved job training program for local citizens, no, The project is located at a public park serving all community members, project provides recretional opportunities in a rural location that is economically depressed and has potential to boost tourism income, NEPA and NHPA process engaged tribal groups in the review process, EPA-led Health Impact Analysis, Design is currently in progress - these outreach activities are planned, No, This was not a GLRI priority or reason for funding. But this project is at a Boy Scout camp that is open to any enrolled youth & has a specific program to include diverse participants., project engaged underserved youth in stewardship activities, The project was designed to benefit species such as Lake Whitefish and Lake Trout, which are extremely important fisheries, which would directly benefit regional Odawa tribes., State minority hire contracting rules, The project will include environmental justice and equity as part of the design and implementation process, but has not yet gotten to those stages., Incorporated work crews from the Gordon Corretion Center (GCC) Community Enhancement Program. The GCC project crew assists local government agencies and non-profit organizations on a variety of work projects, incorporating a positive work experience, building new skills, and giving back to the community.
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: Other
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: The project design process engaged tribal groups or considered Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK).
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: Interpretive programs for youth, at-risk, and under-served populations were created.
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: The project design included planning to improve recreational access for youth, at-risk, and under-served populations.
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: The specific needs of a local renter population were considered.
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: The need for low-income housing was considered during the planning process.
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: Local participation in the planning process was representative of the local population or recreation user base.
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: N/A The project did not directly impact a community given geographic isolation or another reason.
Collection date: 2021-03-01
Response options: newsletter article in a periodical shared to general public and partners, Public notice of applicable permits with a comment opportunity., Landowners, stakeholders, USFWS and Michigan DNR involved in many decisions., Clinton River AOC Public Advisory Council, Public Outreach and stakeholder meetings were held at the time of developing the park master plan which the project was based off of., CITY OF MONROE COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT & WATER QUALITY USED LOCALLY, A master plan was conducted several years earlier that involved stakeholders and significant public input, but there weren't any specific public meetings for this project only., Public education, trainaings and flyers were created at the conclusion of the project., A local advisory board was in place and formed 10+ years ago to achieve the organization's goals for the river., unknown, Project funded multiple individual grant projects, each project may answer differently, Project Website, Community partners were engaged to help with volunteer removals, workshops held with agency reps, student field trips were engaged in restoration activities., school groups and volunteer groups were involved in invasive species, This project is ongoing., Local partners are involved in development and implementation (didn't check the local partner option because we also engaged general public); Public comment period on chemical treatments will occur in FY21, EPA-led Health Impact Assessment, Design is currently in progress - these outreach activities are planned