Response options: Easier solution/works faster, Less likely to spread/keep it from spreading, Results/better way to contain/control, Shouldn't be moved around/better to leave it where it is, Depends where/what type of site/problem it is, Better for monitoring/studying purposes, No need to move it/will ... own/already done its harm, Other, DK/NA
Response options: Excavation can increase hazards, Excavation not always possible, Excavation is too costly/impractical, Excavation is disruptive, Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else, Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else, Other, DK/NA
Response options: Excavation can increase hazards, Excavation not always possible, Excavation is too costly/impractical, Excavation is disruptive, Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else, Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else, Other, DK/NA
Response options: Excavation can increase hazards, Excavation not always possible, Excavation is too costly/impractical, Excavation is disruptive, Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else, Excavation simply transfers problem to somewhere else, Other, DK/NA
Response options: Site can be re-used, Less likely to spread/keep if from spreading, Easier/faster way to contain/control, Something being ... problem/better than doing nothing, Would remove it from/clean up area/would be gone, Can take waste where .../treated effectively and safely, Better way to contain and control/gets results, Cost issues (various), Potential negative effects on environment/wildlife, Less people affected/less threat to locals, Depends on location, Could still seep into/effect the ground, Don't/can't trust anyone to monitor it, Other, DK/NA