Response options: Institutional processes specific to managing Earth science data., It depends on the perceived need/utility of sharing and storing data and there are specific people tasked with figuring it out, I'm supposed to "write it up" but no clue on how data to be stored, Granting agency receives digital copies of the data, The USGS data management program is new so I am not yet fully familiar with it., No institutional support - managing and storing data falls entirely to the PI, a national archive, The problem is that formal process exist, but they are not applied since only myself as data manager is really involved in., This is the problem, we have a process and an open government data storage portal, but no resources or support to get data into it, I know there are policies, but I haven't been at my current employer long enough to know what they are yet., Internal Review Board, None, just myself, Electronic Lab Notebook - LabArchives, The research team, I know we have a policy - just not sure what it is, informatic division, data stored according to the Museum's own process management, Servers with databases wihich host data, data centre staff, Colleagues in my own unit run a world data center and are mainly IT guys
Response options: DDI, DataCite Metadata Schema, DDI, metadata standardized within my international telescope collaboration, Don't know, DataCite, Genome Standards Consortium, RIF-CS metadata standard in Australia, ACDD, igsn, BIDS (Brain Imaging Data Structure), CF Convention, our data is in several databases shared by a number of teams, Genebank, SDD (structured descriptive data) standard of TDWG, SDMX, OMV, DCAT, VOID, VOAF, MOD, PROV, SCHEMA.org, Metadata standardized within funding source, different funding source in Taiwan ask a different format, But also many others, and depending on the data types and study to describe; we use https://fairsharing.org/standards to find the appropriate one, Genomic Observatories Metadatabase, Evolving standard in field spectroscopy
